El modelo de innovación Triple Hélice

Un análisis de la producción científica

Autores

  • Carmen Gálvez Universidad de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4453

Palavras-chave:

Triple Hélice, Innovación, Economía del conocimiento, Política científica, Bibliometría

Resumo

En este trabajo se analiza la producción científica sobre el modelo de la Triple Hélice, basado en la interacción entre universidad-industria-gobierno, el cual resalta la relevancia del rol de las universidades en la transición de una sociedad industrial hacia otra basada en el conocimiento. Se utilizaron indicadores bibliométricos y técnicas de análisis factorial. Se recuperaron un total de 593 publicaciones indexadas en la colección central de Web of Science (WoS), desde 1993 hasta 2022. Se identificaron los autores, países, instituciones y revistas más productivas, los manuscritos con mayor impacto y la estructura temática y conceptual en el campo científico analizado.

Referências

Amable, B., Barré, R., & Boyer, R. (2008). Los sistemas de innovación en la era de la globalización. Ciepp - Miño y Dávila.

Aria M., Cuccurullo C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4),959-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bradford, S. C. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects 1934. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 176-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000407

Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-34. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. https://www.igi-global.com/article/triple-helix-quadruple-helix-quintuple/41959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105

Carayannis, E. G. & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 212-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 14-19.

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Pinter.

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A “Triple Helix” of university–industry–government relations, Introduction to a theme issue. Minerva, 36, 203-08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004348123030

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. https://doi:10.1177/05390184030423002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J. M. C. & Almeida, M. (2005). Towards “meta-innovation” in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple hélix. Research Policy, 34(4), 411-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4

Fernández, S. F. (2011). Análisis Factorial. https://docplayer.es/9019720-Santiago-de-la-fuente-fernandez-analisis-factorial.html

Hartigan, J. A., Wong, M. A. (1979). A K-means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830

Hirsch, J. E . (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) USA, 102(46), 16569-72. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Leydesdorff, L. & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016

Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3

Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4

Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-62. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

Sábato, J. A. & Botana, N. (1968). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración, 1(3), 15-36.

Sábato, J. A. (1975). El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia-tecnología-desarrollo-dependencia. Paidós.

Sábato, J. A. & Mackenzie, M. (1982). La producción de tecnología. Autónoma o transnacional. Nueva Imagen.

Singer, P. (2009) Relaciones entre sociedad y estado en la economía solidaria. Íconos, 33, 51-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.33.2009.320

Van Raan AFJ. (2005). Measurement of Central Aspects of Scientific Research: Performance, Interdisciplinarity. Measurement, 3, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_1

Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, Ch., Lu, Z., Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and autor keywords: a case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 967-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437

Downloads

Publicado

2022-12-29

Como Citar

Gálvez, C. (2022). El modelo de innovación Triple Hélice: Un análisis de la producción científica. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review /Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia Y Sociedad, 11(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4453

Edição

v. 11 n. 5 (2022): Monografía: "Inovação de ponta baseada em textos acadêmicos de pré e pós-doutorado"

Seção

Artigos de pesquisa (monográfico)

Licença

Os autores/as que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Os autores/as terão os direitos morais do trabalho e cederão para a revista os direitos comerciais.
  2. Um ano após a sua publicação, a versão do editor estará em acesso aberto no site da editora, mas a revista manterá o copyright da obra.
  3. No caso dos autores desejarem asignar uma licença aberta Creative Commons (CC), poderão a solicitar escrevendo a publishing@eagora.org