Management of Research and Innovation Projects under the Triple Helix Model

Authors

  • Paola Andrea Valencia Achuri Universidad de Cundinamarca, Fusagasugá
  • Jorge Enrique Taboada Álvarez Universidad Ean, Bogotá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4466

Keywords:

Triple Helix, University, Industry, Government, Society, Projects management, CTeI projects

Abstract

The model known as the Triple Helix (Government, University, Industry/Society), promotes the development of a country through research and innovation. Currently there is no review on the relationship and interaction between the actors of the model, focused on the management of CTeI projects. This exploratory article allows an approach to the management of CTeI projects under the model, presenting the theoretical references on the interactions, results and benefits of cooperation between the actors, followed by a review of methodologies and knowledge frameworks in project management. projects applied in CTeI projects.

References

Aarseth, W., Rolstadas, A., & Andersen, B. (2014). Managing organizational challenges in global projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2011-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-02-2011-0008

Abbas, A., Avdic, A., Xiaobao, P., Hasan, M. M., & Ming, W. (2019). University-government collaboration for the generation and commercialization of new knowledge for use in industry. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 4(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.002

Alonso, E., & Beltrán, A. (2015). Propuesta de un modelo de vinculación para una universidad basada en la triple hélice. Revista Global de Negocios, 3(6), 45–62.

Antwi, S. H., & Ley, D. (2021). Renewable energy project implementation in Africa: Ensuring sustainability through community acceptability. Scientific African, 11, e00679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00679

Arechavala Vargas, R. (2011). Las universidades y el desarrollo de la investigación científica y tecnológica en México: una agenda de investigación. Revista de La Educación Superior, 40(158), 41–57.

Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2020). Learning outcomes in online citizen science communities designed for inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(4), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1836689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1836689

Bai, Y., Li, Z., Wu, K., Yang, J., Liang, S., Ouyang, B., Chen, Z., & Wang, J. (2018). Researchain: Union Blockchain Based Scientific Research Project Management System. Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Xi’an, China, 2018, 4206–4209. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2018.8623571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2018.8623571

Bautista, E. G. (2015). La vinculación entre agentes heterogéneos para la producción de conocimiento e innovación. Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo, 5(10), 213. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v5i10.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v5i10.112

Bencke, F. F., Dorion, E. C. H., Prodanov, C. C., & Olea, P. M. (2020). Community leadership and the Triple Helix model as determinants of the constitution of science parks: A Brazilian experience. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2018-0225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2018-0225

CEPAL, C. E. para A. L. y E. C. (n.d.). Acerca de Innovación, ciencia y tecnología. https://www.cepal.org/es/temas/innovacion-ciencia-y-tecnologia/acerca-innovacion-ciencia-tecnologia

CEPAL, C. E. para A. L. y E. C., & ONU, O. de las N. U. (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40155/24/S1801141_es.pdf

Chang, H. (2010). El modelo de la triple hélice como un medio para la vinculación entre la Universidad y Empresa. Revista Nacional de Administración, 1(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22458/rna.v1i1.286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22458/rna.v1i1.286

Chari, R., Petrun Sayers, E. L., Amiri, S., Leinhos, M., Kotzias, V., Madrigano, J., Thomas, E. V, Carbone, E. G., & Uscher-Pines, L. (2019). Enhancing community preparedness: an inventory and analysis of disaster citizen science activities. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1356. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7689-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7689-x

Colciencias, D. A. de C. T. e I. (2016). Actores del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/ckeditor_files/politiciadeactores-snctei.pdf

Colciencias, D. A. de C. T. e I. (2017). Preguntas frecuentes. https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/preguntasfrecuentes-colciencias.pdf

Colciencias, D. A. de C. T. e I. (2018). Departamento administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Colciencias. Sector Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación. https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/ckeditor_files/COLCIENCIAS - DIRECTORIO DE ENTIDADESver 30_04_2018.pdf

CONPES 3582. (2009). Política Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 2009. https://minciencias.gov.co/node/301

Cunningham, J. A., Mangematin, V., O’Kane, C., & O’Reilly, P. (2016). At the frontiers of scientific advancement: the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 778–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9400-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9400-4

Del Río Cortina, A., & Sánchez Serna, A. (2017). Colaboración de stakeholders en el marco de proyectos de investigación innovadores. Revista Espacios, 38(24), 25.

Ding, J., Yu, H., & Li, M. (2020). Application of Project Management in the Management of Teaching and Research Projects in University. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 455, 44–47. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200801.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200801.010

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Fernandes, G., Pinto, E. B., Araújo, M., & Machado, R. J. (2020). The roles of a Programme and Project Management Office to support collaborative university–industry R&D. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 31(5–6), 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1436963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1436963

Ferreira, M. L. A., & Ramos, R. R. (2015). Making university-industry technological partnerships work: A case study in the Brazilian oil innovation system. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 10(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242015000100013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242015000100013

García Rodríguez, M. J. (2015). Estudio comparativo entre las metodologías ágiles y las tradicionales para la gestión de proyectos software [Tesis de master. Universidad de Oviedo]. https://digibuo.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10651/32457/TFMMlJGarciaRodriguezRUO.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y

Gaitán Moya, J., Lozano Ascencio, C. H., Caffarel-Serra, C. y Piñuel Raigada, J. L. (2021). La investigación en comunicación en proyectos I+D en España de 2007 a 2018. Revista Latina, 79, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1486

Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J., & Ratten, V. (2019). Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10 (3), 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103

Gibb, A., Haskins, G. & Robertson, I. (2009). Leading the Entrepreneurial University. Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions. www.researchgate.net/publication/285630640_Towards_the_entrepreneurial_university

Gómez Abad, D. (2016). Una etnografía de la participación ciudadana en la producción de conocimiento cinetífico y tecnológico. XII Congreso Español de Sociología, 1–26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330639352_UNA_ETNOGRAFIA_DE_LA_PARTICIPACION_CIUDADANA_EN_LA_PRODUCCION_DE_CONOCIMIENTO_CIENTIFICO_Y_TECNOLOGICO

Harris, L., Liboiron, M., Charron, L., & Mather, C. (2021). Using citizen science to evaluate extended producer responsibility policy to reduce marine plastic debris shows no reduction in pollution levels. Marine Policy, 123, 104319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104319

Heijs, J., & Jimenez, L. (2010). Relaciones industria-ciencia: importancia, conceptos básicos y factores de éxito. In Documento de trabajo No 76 2010 -Instituto de Análisis Industrial y Financiero. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/31218/

Hernández Trasobares, A., & Murillo Luna, J. L. (2020). The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120296

Hernández, L. C., Verástegui, J. L., & Melo, N. A. P. (2014). La gestión de la triple hélice: fortaleciendo las relaciones entre la universidad, empresa, gobierno. Multiciencias, 14(4), 438-446.

Hidalgo, E. S. (2019). Adapting the scrum framework for agile project management in science: case study of a distributed research initiative. Heliyon, 5(3), e01447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01447

Hielscher, S., & Jaeger Erben, M. (2021). From quick fixes to repair projects: Insights from a citizen science project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123875. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123875

Hors, C., Carla Goldberg, A., Haroldo Pereira de Almeida, E., Galan Babio Júnior, F., & Vicente Rizzo, L. (2012). Application of the enterprise management tools Lean Six Sigma and PMBOK in developing a program of research management Aplicação das ferramentas de gestão empresarial Lean Seis Sigma e PMBOK no desenvolvimento de um programa de gestão da pesquisa científi. Health Economics and Mnagement, 10(4), 480–490. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/eins/v10n4/v10n4a15.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082012000400015

Invernizzi, N. (2004). Participación ciudadana en ciencia y tecnología en América Latina: una oportunidad para refundar el compromiso social de la universidad pública. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad - CTS, 1(2), 67–83.

Jacques Aviñó, C., Pons Vigués, M., Mcghie, J. E., Rodríguez Giralt, I., Medina Perucha, L., Mahtani Chugani, V., Pujol Ribera, E., & Berenguera Ossó, A. (2020). Public participation in research projects: ways of creating collective knowledge in health. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34(2), 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.08.010

Kaklauskas, A., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., Binkyte, A., Lepkova, N., Survila, A., Lill, I., Tantaee, S., & Banaitis, A. (2018). A model and system for an integrated analysis of the iterative life cycle of university-industry partnerships. Procedia Engineering, 212(2017), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.035

Kayser, A. C., Schmidt, S., & Dal Ri, R. S. (2018). University-Industry Collaborative Projects: Analysis and Proposal of Management Practices. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 9(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v9i1.610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v9i1.610

Khodyakov, D., Stockdale, S., Jones, A., Mango, J., Jones, F., & Lizaola, E. (2013). On Measuring Community Participation in Research. Health Education and Behavior, 40(3), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112459050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112459050

King, G. S., & Cameron, C. R. (2013). An Enhanced Model for University-Industry Collaboration for Innovation in Trinidad and Tobago. West Indies Journal of Engineering, 36(1), 86–94.

LaBrec, P., & Butterfield, R. (2016). Using agile methods in research - 3M Inside Angle. 3M Health Care. https://www.3mhisinsideangle.com/blog-post/using-agile-methods-in-research/

Land Zandstra, A. M., Devilee, J. L. A., Frans, S., Buurmeijer, F., & Van den Broek, J. M. (2016). Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515602406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515602406

León Romero, R. (2010). Planificación de Proyectos De Investigación y Desarrollo (I+D) en Cooperación. Perspectivas, 25, 203–225.

Lerman, L. V., Gerstlberger, W., Ferreira Lima, M., & Frank, A. G. (2021). How governments, universities, and companies contribute to renewable energy development? A municipal innovation policy perspective of the triple helix. Energy Research and Social Science, 71, 101854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101854

Li, M., He, L., & Zhao, Y. (2020). The triple helix system and regional entrepreneurship in China. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(7–8), 508–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1666168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2019.1666168

Luengo, M. J., & Obeso, M. (2013). El efecto de la triple hélice en los resultados de innovación. RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, 53(4), 388–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902013000400006

Marchesi, M., Mannaro, K., Uras, S., & Locci, M. (2007). Distributed scrum in research project management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4536 LNCS, 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73101-6_45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73101-6_45

Monje, Á, C. A. (2011). Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa y cualitativa: Guía didáctica. Neiva, Colombia: Universidad Surcolombiana. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas. Programa de Comunicación Social y Periodismo.

Munz, S., & Melissa, I. (2013). El enfoque de gestión de proyectos en las organizaciones dedicadas a proyectos de investigación. Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, 74, 152–161.

OCTS, O. I. de la C. la T. y la S. (2018). Las universidades, pilares de la ciencia y la tecnología en América Latina. III Conferencia Regional de Educación Superior, 47. http://www.octs-oei.org/manual-vinculacion/attachments/article/65/CRES2018.pdf

ONU, O. de las N. U. (2017). La ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación como catalizadores de los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Conferencia de Las Naciones Unidas Sobre Comercio y Desarrrollo, 1–17. https://unctad.org/meetings/es/SessionalDocuments/ciid36_ES.pdf

Ota, M. (2010). Scrum in research. Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6240, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16066-0_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16066-0_18

Pardo Martínez, C. I. (2019). El modelo triple hélice: la articulación Estado, empresa y universidad. https://www.portafolio.co/innovacion/el-modelo-triple-helice-la-articulacion-estado-empresa-y-universidad-530122

Pirro, L. (2019). How agile project management can work for your research. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01184-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01184-9

Ponce Jaramillo, I. E., & Güemes Castorella, Da. (2017). Factores clave en la vinculación de la triple hélice: matriz del estado del arte. XVII Congreso Latino Iberoaméricano de Gestión Tecnológica-ALTEC, 1–14.

Ramírez Salazar, M. del P., & Valderrama, M. G. (2010). La Alianza Universidad-Empresa-Estado: una estrategia para promover innovación. Revista EAN, 68, 112–133. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n68.2010.500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n68.2010.500

Ramos, D. B., Ramos, I. M. M., Viana, W. D. S., Silva, G. R. E., & De Oliveira, E. H. T. (2016). On the use of Scrum for the management of research-oriented projects. Nuevas Ideas En Informática Educativa, 589–594. http://www.tise.cl/volumen12/

Restrepo Ortiz, G. E., & Zabala Mendoza, D. E. (2016). Indicadores de gestión para proyectos de investigación y extensión en instituciones de Educación Superior. Revista Ciencias Estratégicas, 24(36), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.18566/rces.v24n36.a13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18566/rces.v24n36.a13

Riol, H., & Thuillier, D. (2015). Project management for academic research projects: Balancing structure and flexibility. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 7(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2015.070792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2015.070792

Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 142-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.032

Segev, T., Harvey, A. P., Ajmani, A., Johnson, C., Longfellow, W., Vandiver, K. M., & Hemond, H. (2021). A case study in participatory science with mutual capacity building between university and tribal researchers to investigate drinking water quality in rural Maine. Environmental Research, 192, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110460

Serna Pérez, M. G. (2020). Colaboración entre centros públicos de investigación para el desarrollo regional: un análisis de caso en Aguascalientes, México. Espiral Estudios Sobre Estado y Sociedad, 27(77). https://doi.org/doi: https://doi.org/10.32870/ eees.v27i77.7054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/eees.v27i77.7054

Solleiro, J. L., Castaño, R., Luna, K., Herrera, A., & Montiel, M. (2006). La política de Innovación en México, España, Chile y Corea: Un análisis comparativo. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jose-Solleiro/publication/228467004_La_politica_de_Innovacion_en_Mexico_Espana_Chile_y_Corea_Un_Analisis_Comparativo/links/00b4952d1654dc14b9000000/La-politica-de-Innovacion-en-Mexico-Espana-Chile-y-Corea-Un-Analisis-C

Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2018). The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10), 1964–1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.004

Tolstykh, T., Gamidullaeva, L., & Shmeleva, N. (2021). Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective. SAGE Open, 11(1), 215824402098870. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988704

Trejo Berumen, K. S., Gámez, A. E., Conesa Cegarra, F., Villa, M. Á., Boncheva, A. I., & Beltrán Morales, L. F. (2018). El sistema nacional de innovación de México. Una comparación con España y Estados Unidos de América. Acta Universitaria. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 28(1). doi: 10.15174/au.2018.1430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2018.1430

Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, A., Heigl, F., & Bonn, A. (2018). The threefold potential of environmental citizen science - Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225, 176–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024

UNESCO, O. de las N. U. para la E. la C. y la C. (2015). La investigación es clave para conseguir los Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible. https://es.unesco.org/news/investigacion-es-clave-conseguir-objetivos-del-desarrollo-sostenible-segun-informe-unesco

Valencia Galván, J. (2013). Modelo de sistema de información para apoyar la gestión de proyectos de investigación en grupos de investigación. Scientia Et Technica, 18(4), 690–697. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.8887

Velázquez-Juárez, J. A., Valencia-Pérez, L. R., & Peña-Aguilar, J. M. (2016). El papel del modelo de la triple hélice como sistema de innovación para aumentar la rentabilidad en una Pyme comercializadora. Revista CEA, 2(3), 101. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.268

Vieira do Santos, E., Ferreira Mendes Vieira, E. S., Pinheiro Machado, R., & Guimaraes Vasconcellos, A. (2015). Technology transfer from university to companies: An analysis based on co-ownership granted patents in Brazil, from 2000-2014. https://www.triplehelixassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Panel-Session-5：University-Industry-relationships.pdf

Villa, J. L., & Cera, V. (2019). Análisis de la Gestión de proyectos de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación bajo principios del PMI. LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2019.1.1.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2019.1.1.175

Volkodavova, E. V., Goryacheva, T. V., Zhabin, A. P., & Nazarov, S. V. (2019). Entrepreneurial university as an element of the national innovation system. Espacios, 40(19). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2019-19-2-134-141

Vom Brocke, J., & Lippe, S. (2010). Taking a project management perspective on design science research. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_3

Walker, D. W., Smigaj, M., & Tani, M. (2021). The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities. WIREs Water , 8(1), e1488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1488

Zapata, S. A. (2014). Modelo de gestión de proyectos de ciencia, tecnología e innovación financiados con recursos del estado. http://docplayer.es/5118902-Modelo-de-gestion-de-proyectos-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-financiados-con-recursos-del-estado.html

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Valencia Achuri, P. A., & Taboada Álvarez, J. E. (2022). Management of Research and Innovation Projects under the Triple Helix Model. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review /Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia Y Sociedad, 11(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4466

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Monograph: "Cutting-edge innovation from pre- and post-doctoral academic texts"

Section

Research Articles (Special Issue)

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org