The Triple Helix Model of Innovation

An Analysis of Scientific Production

Authors

  • Carmen Gálvez Universidad de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4453

Keywords:

Triple Helix, Innovation, Knowledge economy, Science policy, Bibliometrics

Abstract

This paper analyzes the scientific production on the Triple Helix model, based on the interaction between university-industry-government, which highlights the relevance of the role of universities in the transition from an industrial society to another based on knowledge. Bibliometric indicators and factor analysis techniques were used. A total of 593 publications indexed in the central collection of Web of Science (WoS) were retrieved, from 1993 to 2022. The most productive authors, countries, institutions and journals, the manuscripts with the greatest impact and the thematic and conceptual structure in the scientific field analyzed.

References

Amable, B., Barré, R., & Boyer, R. (2008). Los sistemas de innovación en la era de la globalización. Ciepp - Miño y Dávila.

Aria M., Cuccurullo C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4),959-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bradford, S. C. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects 1934. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 176-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000407

Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-34. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. https://www.igi-global.com/article/triple-helix-quadruple-helix-quintuple/41959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105

Carayannis, E. G. & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 212-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 14-19.

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Pinter.

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A “Triple Helix” of university–industry–government relations, Introduction to a theme issue. Minerva, 36, 203-08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004348123030

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337. https://doi:10.1177/05390184030423002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J. M. C. & Almeida, M. (2005). Towards “meta-innovation” in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple hélix. Research Policy, 34(4), 411-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4

Fernández, S. F. (2011). Análisis Factorial. https://docplayer.es/9019720-Santiago-de-la-fuente-fernandez-analisis-factorial.html

Hartigan, J. A., Wong, M. A. (1979). A K-means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830

Hirsch, J. E . (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) USA, 102(46), 16569-72. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Leydesdorff, L. & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.016

Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3

Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4

Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-62. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

Sábato, J. A. & Botana, N. (1968). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración, 1(3), 15-36.

Sábato, J. A. (1975). El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia-tecnología-desarrollo-dependencia. Paidós.

Sábato, J. A. & Mackenzie, M. (1982). La producción de tecnología. Autónoma o transnacional. Nueva Imagen.

Singer, P. (2009) Relaciones entre sociedad y estado en la economía solidaria. Íconos, 33, 51-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.33.2009.320

Van Raan AFJ. (2005). Measurement of Central Aspects of Scientific Research: Performance, Interdisciplinarity. Measurement, 3, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_1

Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, Ch., Lu, Z., Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WOS and autor keywords: a case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 967-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Gálvez, C. (2022). The Triple Helix Model of Innovation: An Analysis of Scientific Production. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review /Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia Y Sociedad, 11(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4453

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Monograph: "Cutting-edge innovation from pre- and post-doctoral academic texts"

Section

Research Articles (Special Issue)

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org