The psychology of communicating trust: consensual dependency of trust and knowledge sharing

Authors

  • Rejina M. Selvam Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain / Research group of PSICOSAO, University of Barcelona, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v19.4913

Keywords:

Trust, Knowledge sharing, Psychological-communication, Bi-directionality, Longitudinal study

Abstract

Trust indicates positive effects on mental and social health in the work environment. In this study it was aimed to analyze the bidirectionality of trust and knowledge sharing variables over time. Results showed that there is a time pattern in the relationship between the two measures, where in time 1 (initial stage) participants have higher trust through knowledge sharing. In time 2 (middle stage) trust decreases and finally in time 3 (matured stage) it again increases. Finally, implications of the study and how knowledge sharing can be an antecedent to trust building atleast in the initial stage is discussed.

References

Alarcon, G.M., Lyons, J.B., Christensen, J.C. et al. The effect of propensity to trust and perceptions of trustworthiness on trust behaviors in dyads. Behavioral Research, 50, 1906–1920 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0959-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0959-6

Aubert, Benoit & Kelsey, Barbara. (2003). Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams. Small Group Research. (34). 575-618. 10.1177/1046496403256011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403256011

Assem, P.B. and Pabbi, K.A. (2016), Knowledge sharing among healthcare professionals in Ghana, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2015-0048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2015-0048

Bao, G.M., Xu, B.X. and Zhang, Z.Y. (2016), Employees’ trust and their knowledge sharing and integration: the mediating roles of organizational identification and organization based self-esteem, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 14:3, 362-375, DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2015.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.1

Barczak, Gloria & Lassk, Felicia & Mulki, Jay. (2010). Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team, Trust and Collaborative Culture. Creativity and Innovation Management. 19. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x

Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.

Bordia, P., Irmer, B.E. and Abusah, D. (2006), Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: the role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 262-280 15:3, 262-280, DOI: 10.1080/13594320500417784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500417784

Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006

Butler, J. K. Jr., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.1.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.1.19

Burnet, J. (1903). Plato. Platonis Opera. Oxford University Press.

Cabrera, E.F. and Cabrera, A. (2005), Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 720-735. DOI: 10.1080/09585190500083020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020

Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman and Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations 35-70. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Carter, N. T., Carter, D. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2018). Implications of Observability for the Theory and Measurement of Emergent Team Phenomena. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1398–1425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315609402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315609402

Cascio, Wayne. (2000). Managing A Virtual Workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives. 14. 10.5465/AME.2000.4468068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.4468068

Cheng X, Macaulay L, Zarifis A (2013a) Modeling individual trust in computer mediated teams: a comparison of approaches. Computers in Human Behavior. 29. 1733–1741. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.018

Cheng X, Nolan T, Macaulay L (2013b) Don’t give up the community—a viewpoint of trust development inonline collaboration. Information Technology &amp People. 26. 298-318. 10.1108/ITP-10-2012-0116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2012-0116

Cheng, X., Yin, G., Azadegan, A. et al. (2016) Trust Evolvement in Hybrid Team Collaboration: A Longitudinal Case Study. Group Decis Negot 25, 267–288 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9442-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9442-x

Crisp, C.B., Jarvenpaa, S.L., 2013. Swift trust in global virtual teams: trusting beliefs and normative actions. Journal of Personal Psychology. 12 (1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1027/ 1866-5888/a000075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000075

Crossman, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2004). Trust, commitment and team working: The paradox of virtual organizations. Global Networks, 4 (4), 375-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00099.x

Diels, H., & Kranz, W. (1952). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Weidmann

De Jong, B.A., Dirks, K.T. and Gillespie, N. (2015), Trust and team performance: a meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 101 (8). 1134-1150.doi: 101. 10.1037/apl0000110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000110

Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678–711. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1177/104649649903000602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000602

Dietz, G. and Den Hartog, D. (2006), Measuring trust inside organizations, Personnel Review, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 557-588. 10.1108/00483480610682299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480610682299

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. 2002. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 611-628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611

Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445

Erdem, F., & Ozen, J. (2003). Cognitive and affective dimensions of trust in developing team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 9, 131–135. Doi: 10.1108/13527590310493846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590310493846

Faraj, S. and Sproull, L. (2000), Coordinating expertise in software development teams, Management Science, 46. 1554-1568. 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072

Feitosa, Jennifer & Grossman, Rebecca & Kramer, William & Salas, Eduardo. (2020). Measuring Team Trust: A Critical and Meta‐Analytical Review. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 10.1002/job.2436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2436

Fiol, C. & O’Connor, Edward. (2005). Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions. Organization Science - ORGAN SCI. 16. 19-32. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0101

Greenberg PS, Greenberg RH, Antonucci YL (2007) Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams. Business Horizons. 50. 325-333. 10.1016/j.bushor.2007.02.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.02.005

Grossman, R., & Feitosa, J. (2018). Team trust over time: Modeling reciprocal and contextual influences in action teams. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.006

Hicks, R. (1972). Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Diogenes Laertius. Harvard University Press.

McEvily, S. K., Das, S., & McCabe, K. (2000). Avoiding competence substitution through knowledge sharing. Academy of Management Review, 25, 294–311. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3312917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3312917

Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815. 10.1111/j. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791

Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29–64. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00080.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518185

Jehn. K. A., Northcraft, G. B.. & Neale. M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763. Doi: 10.2307/2667054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054

Jones, S. L., & Shah, P. P. (2016). Diagnosing the locus of trust: A temporal perspective for trustor, trustee, and dyadic influences on perceived trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000041

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20, 240–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080 .0383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0383

Klein, K., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. 1994. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19: 195-229. doi:10.2307/ 258703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210745

Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. 1994. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 656-669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256704

Kramer R M (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50:569-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569

Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477–1490. 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136

Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123

Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995), An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

Mayer, R., & Gavin, M. (2005). Trust in Management and Performance: Who Minds the Shop while the Employees Watch the Boss? The Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803928

Mcdermott, R.. (1999). Why Information Technology Inspired But Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 41. 10.2307/41166012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166012

Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (p. 166–195). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n9

Möllering, G. (2006), Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Nandhakumar, J., & Baskerville, R. (2006). Durability of online teamworking: patterns of trust. Information Technology & People, 19(4), 371-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840610718045

Panteli, N., & Duncan, E. (2004). Trust and temporary virtual teams: alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships. Information Technology & People, 17(4), 423-441. 10.1108/09593840410570276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840410570276

Porter TW, Lilly B S (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4): 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022787

Pinjani, P., Palvia, P., 2013. Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information Management. 50 (4), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002

Ross, D. (1924). Aristotle. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Clarendon Press, 21-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198847779.book.1

Riege, A. (2005), Three‐dozen knowledge‐sharing barriers managers must consider, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 18-35 https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602746

Robert, L., Dennis, A., & Hung, Y. (2009). Individual swift trust and knowledge‐based trust in face‐to‐face and virtual team members. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 241–279. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222260210

Rose J & Schlichter BR (2013) Decoupling, re-engaging: managing trust relationships in implementation projects. Informational Systems Journal. 23(1):5–33 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2400326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00392.x

Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393-404. doi:10.1016/S0099-1767(98)90076-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617

Sarah Fischer & Shannon Hyder & Arlene Walker, 2020. “The effect of employee affective and cognitive trust in leadership on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitment: Meta-analytic findings and implications for trust research,” Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(4), pages 662-679, November. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219899450

Sarker S, AhujaM, Sarker S, Kirkeby S (2011) The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: a social network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1):273–310. 10.2307/41304612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280109

Sharkie, R. (2005) Precariousness under the new psychological contract: the effect on trust and the willingness to converse and share knowledge. Knowledge Management Res Pract, 3(1):37–44 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500051

Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M. & Locke, E. A. (2006) Empowering Leadership in Management Team: Effects on Knowledge Sharing Efficacy, and Team Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1239-5. 10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478718

Staples, D. S., & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems Journal, 18, 617–640. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00244.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00244.x

Uzzi, B. and J. J. Gillespie (2002). Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the form’s debt performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, (23): 595-618. 10.1002/smj.241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.241

Waston S & Hewett K (2006). A multi-theoretical model of knowledge contribution and knowledge reuse [1]. Management Studies, 43(2), 141- 173. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00586.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00586.x

Wilson JM, Straus SG, McEvily B (2006) All in due time: the development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 99(1):16–33. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001

Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job‐ related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta‐ analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141–162. 10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00093-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700202

Yusof, S., Zakaria N. (2012). Exploring the state of discipline on the formation of swift trust within global virtual teams. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Maui, Hawaii. IEEE Press, pp 475–482. 10.1109/HICSS.2012.272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.272

Zhou Mi, Yao Fang, Yao Xiaotao. (2006). Knowledge sharing, knowledge sharing willingness of employees and foundation of the trust. Soft Science, 20(3): 109-113. 10.1080/09720502.2017.1361615.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-08

How to Cite

Selvam, R. M. (2023). The psychology of communicating trust: consensual dependency of trust and knowledge sharing. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v19.4913

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023): Monograph: "Advances and applications in psycho-sociology"

Section

Research Articles (Special Issue)

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org