Human rights and new technologies

Authors

  • Rosa María Ricoy Casas Universidad de Vigo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4486

Keywords:

Fundamental Rights, Technologies, Artificial intelligence, Algorithms, Social score, Data protection, Politics

Abstract

Numerous risks have been evidenced not only for data protection, but in general for the fundamental rights of the person such as equality and freedom with the use of numerous technological applications. Ethical biases and dilemmas in the application of artificial intelligence and algorithms, interference in electoral processes or control and social score techniques for political purposes are analyzed. It reflects on the dysfunctions and inequities of many of these new tools for citizenship, and proposes solutions that generate well-being for our democratic societies.

References

Allport, G.W.; Postman, L. (1947). The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Henry Holt.

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L. (2016, March 23). Machine Bias. There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks, ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

Bhandari, B. (2018, January 2). China’s Year in Scams. Despite tougher laws, Chinese citizens continue to get swindled in a surprising variety of ways, Sixthtone. https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1001431/chinas-year-in-scams

BBC (2018, April 9). Cómo Cambridge Analytica analizó la personalidad de millones de usuarios de Facebook. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7831NGClsrM

Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., Kalai, A. (2016). Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings, The Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (NIPS 2016), pp. 4349–435. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.06520v1.pdf

Buolamwini, J. (2017). How I’m fighting bias in algorithms, TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/joy_buolamwini_how_i_m_fighting_bias_in_algorithms/transcript

Campbell, C. (2019). How China Is Using “Social Credit Scores” to Reward and Punish Its Citizens, Time. https://time.com/collection/davos-2019/5502592/china-social-credit-score/

Chen, M. y Grossklags, J. (2020). An Analysis of the Current State of the Consumer Credit Reporting System in China, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2020 (4), DOI:10.2478/popets-2020-0064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2020-0064

Coglianese, C. y Lehr, D. (2017). Regulating by robot: administrative decision making in the machine-learning era, en Georgetown Law Journal, 105 (5), 1147.

Comisión Europea (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation, Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6ef4df8b-4cea-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1

El Mundo (2016, March 28) Una inteligencia artificial se vuelve racista, antisemita y homófoba en menos de un día en Twitter. https://www.elmundo.es/tecnologia/2016/03/28/56f95c2146163fdd268b45d2.html;

El Mundo (2018, January 16). Google soluciona a las bravas su algoritmo ‚racista‘, que confundía a personas negras con gorilas. https://www.elmundo.es/f5/comparte/2018/01/16/5a5dff50468aeb81638b45e7.html

El País (2016, March 25). Microsoft retira un robot que hizo comentarios racistas en twitter. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2016/03/24/actualidad/1458855274_096966.html

El País (2018, January 14). Google arregla su algoritmo “racista” borrando a los gorilas. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2018/01/14/actualidad/1515955554_803955.html?id_externo_rsoc=TW_CM

El País (2018b, March 22). Así fue el atropello moral del Uber sin conductor. https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/03/22/videos/1521681970_604181.html

Fei, C. (2019). Social Credit System in China, Panorama. Insights into Asian and European Affairs, 2/2018. KAS190325 Digital Asia New Sub Project_FA

Fundación Telefónica (2017). Inteligencia artificial. Las máquinas que aprenden solas. http://fundaciontelefonica.com/

García, R. M. (2019). Tratamiento de datos personales de las opiniones políticas en el marco electoral: todo en interés público, Revista de Estudios Políticos, 183. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.183.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.183.05

Gutiérrez-Rubí, A. (2016). Bots para la comunicación Política. https://www.gutierrez-rubi.es/2016/11/02/bots-en-comunicacion-politica

Harari, Y.N. (2015). Sapiens. De animales a dioses: Breve historia de la humanidad. Debate.

Harari, Y.N. (2019, March 6) Los cerebros “hackeados” votan, Suplemento Ideas de El País. https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/01/04/actualidad/1546602935_606381.html

Harcourt, B.E., (2010). Risk as a Proxy for Race, en Criminology and Public Policy, Forthcoming, University of Chicago Law & Economics Oline Working Paper n.535, University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper n.323. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1677654

Harwell, D. (2018, July 19). The Accent Gap, The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/business/alexa-does-not-understand-your-accent

Hay, B. (2016, January 25). Cinq objets connectés pour économiser l’énergie, La Tribune. https://www.latribune.fr/entreprises-finance/la-tribune-de-l-energie-avec-erdf/cinq-objets-connectes-pour-economiser-l-energie-545571.html

Hern, A. (2017, November 14). Thirty countries use ‘armies of opinion shapers’ to manipulate democracy, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/14/social-media-influence-election-countries-armies-of-opinion-shapers-manipulate-democracy-fake-news

Holgado González, M. (2017). Publicidad e información sobre elecciones en los medios de comunicación durante la campaña electoral. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, 40, 457-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.40.2017.20914 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.40.2017.20914

Horwitz, J. y Goh, B. (2020, May 26). As Chinese authorities expand use of health tracking apps, privacy concerns grow, Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-tech-idUSKBN23212V

Human Rights Council of the United Nations. (2019, October 11). Digital technology, social protection and human rights, Report, A/74/493. https://undocs.org/A/74/493

Lee, A. (2020, August 9). What is China’s social credit system and why is it controversial?, South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3096090/what-chinas-social-credit-system-and-why-it-controversial

Millar, J. (2016). An Ethics Evaluation Tool for Automating Ethical Decision-Making, Robots and Self-Driving Cars, 30(8), 787-809. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229919

Mirror (2016). Intelligent robot that remenbers and learns could be scrapped after escaping a lab for a second time. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/intelligent-robot-remembers-learns-could-8248559

Mistreanu, S. (2018, April 3). Life Inside China’s Social Credit Laboratory, Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/04/03/life-inside-chinas-social-credit-laboratory/

Montero, S. (2021, March 27). Los algoritmos y sus sesgos de género, raza o clase: así te perjudican en la búsqueda de trabajo o de ayudas sociales, Público. https://www.publico.es/ciencias/algoritmos-y-sesgos-genero-raza.html

Mozur, P., Zhong, R. y Krolik, A. (2020, March 1). In Coronavirus Fight, China Gives Citizens a Color Code, With Red Flags, The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/01/business/china-coronavirus-surveillance.html

Needham, K. (2018, March 6). If you get on China’s ‘blacklist,’ you can be banned from travel, The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/big-brother-stops-millions-boarding-planes-trains-in-china-20180306-p4z33u.html

Nowak & Eckel (2012). US Patent no. US20160283485A1. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Obermeyer, Z.; Powers, B.; Vogeli, C.; Mullainathan, S., (2019, October 25). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations, Science 366, Issue 6464. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax2342. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6464/447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342

O´Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown, Penguin Random House: New York.

Pariser, E. (2011). Cuidado con las burbujas de filtro. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles?language=es

Pariser, E. (2017). El filtro burbuja. Taurus.

Pardo, P. (2010, December 29). Las máquinas que controlan la economía, El Mundo. https://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/12/29/internacional/1293605644.html

Pascua,, F.A. (2019). Un nuevo capítulo en la tutela del derecho a la protección de datos personales: los datos de contenido político. comentario a la sentencia del tribunal constitucional 76/2019, de 29 de mayo, en el recurso de inconstitucionalidad núm. 1405-2019, Revista de las Cortes Generales, 106. https://doi.org/10.33426/rcg/2019/106/1411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33426/rcg/2019/106/1411

Peytibi, X. (2012). La segmentación electoral, Más poder local, 13. http://www.maspoderlocal.es/files/articulos/110-F508305df1101350763999-articulo-1.pdf

Perc, M.; Ozer, M.; y Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificialintelligence, Palgrave Commun, 5(61): https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0278-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0278-x

Proyecto Carabela (2019). http://carabela.prhlt.upv.es/es

Público (2017). ¿Qué fue de Tay, el robot de Microsoft que se volvió nazi y machista?. https://acortar.link/EVRCYq

Punset, E. (2008). Por qué somos como somos. Aguilar.

Ramírez-Bustamante, N.; Páez, A. (2021). Análisis jurídico de la discriminación algorítmica en los procesos de selecciónlaboral, SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765741

Ricoy-Casas, R.M. (2019). Inteligencia artificial y políticas públicas en la UE, Valcárcel, P.; Fernández, R.; Bonorino. P.R. (Dirs.), Derecho, desarrollo y nuevas tecnologías, Aranzadi Thomson Reuters, ISBN 9788413087184, 187-234.

Sunstein, C. (2003). República.com: Internet, democracia y libertad (Estado y Sociedad). Estado y Sociedad. Ediciones Paidós.

Tatman, R. (2016, July 12). Google’s speech recognition has a gender bias. https://makingnoiseandhearingthings.com/2016/07/12/googles-speech-recognition-has-a-gender-bias/

Tatman, R. (2017, April 4). Gender and Dialect Bias in YouTube’s Automatic Captions, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-1606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-1606

The Economist (2016, December 17). China invents the digital totalitarian state. The worrying implications of its social-credit project. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2016/12/17/china-invents-the-digital-totalitarian-state

The Guardian (2016, March 24). Tay, Microsoft’s AI chatbot, gets a crash course in racism from Twitter. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/24/tay-microsofts-ai-chatbot-gets-a-crash-course-in-racism-from-twitter

The Guardian (2018, May 29). Computer learns to detect skin cancer more accurately than doctors.

The Washington Post (2016, June 30). The brave escape and untimely demise of one Russian robot. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/06/30/the-brave-escape-and-untimely-demise-of-one-russian-robot/

Thomas, N. (2019, November 11). AI sensor keep fuel flowing at Europe´s largest refinery, Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/bfbac636-ee8b-11e9-a55a-30afa498db1b

Victoria, M. y Nadal, S. (2020, December 8). Los algoritmos que permiten recuperar idiomas perdidos. Un sistema de inteligencia artificial desarrollado por el MIT pretende descifrar lenguas desaparecidas y conocer más sobre las personas que las hablaron, El País. https://elpais.com/retina/2020/12/07/innovacion/1607359036_565608.html

Zuboff, S. (2018). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Publicafairsbook.

Zuckerberg, M. (2018, November 15). A Blueprint for Content Governance and Enforcement, Menlo Park: Facebook.https://m.facebook.com/nt/screen/?params=%7B%22note_id%22%3A751449002072082%7D&path=%2Fnotes%2Fnote%2F&refsrc=deprecated&_rdr

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Ricoy Casas, R. M. . (2022). Human rights and new technologies. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review /Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia Y Sociedad, 12(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v11.4486

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 4 (2022): Monograph: "Entrepreneurship, technologies and business innovation: Where is the 21st century business evolving to?"

Section

Research Articles (Special Issue)

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org