Impact ot the “Peer Instruction Method” supported by “Clickers” on Basic Maths Learning

Authors

  • Rafael Enrique Escudero Universidad del Norte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revtechno.v3.1180

Keywords:

Learning, Interactivity, Dynamism, Motivation, Instruction By Peers

Abstract

This study was intended to promote greater interaction between students and focusing your attention on the under-lying concepts studied in the course basic math, in exchangefor the material in sequence presented in textbooks and class notes. The study was conducted during the first half of 2012 (2012-10) and the 2012 summer period (2012 20), through a process of joint research quantitatively and qualitatively. The number of students treated in 2012 (10) was 249 and 10in the summer period. Of the 249 randomly took a course of 37 students which was a pretest at the start of the course without having received treatment. In the last week, was applied a posttestwhen the student had received the Peer Instruction Meth-od. Equal treatment is made with the summer course. The samples came from normal distributions, which found using the Shapiro-Wilk and Chi square statistical. Found significant differences between the averages of the posttest and pretest in both courses, for which was applied a test for paired as a study before and after samples student's t. For the Group of 37 students t = 5.87212 with p = 0.0000296539 < 0.05. The Group of 10 students t = 4.39678 with p = 0.00172844 < 0.05. The confidence level was of 95%. Surveys were conducted to measure the impact qualitatively, Likert type to all students, in which stood a high favorability (more than 80%) of the method in terms of more dynamic classes, greater motivation, good learning environment, greater participation, sufficient time to answer questions and improvement in learning.

References

Escudero, Rafael. (2011) “Impacto de clases interactivas de respuesta inmediata en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas. (Una aplicación de las TIC en el aula)”.En: Baralt, J. et al [Ed].Orlando, Florida (EE.UU.). Décima conferencia iberoamericana en sistemas, cibernética e informática 19 a 22 de Julio de 2011. Memorias, Vol II, pp. 200 -205.

Galvis, Álvaro. (2004). “Cilic en la didáctica: oportunidades de enseñar y aprender mediante experiencia, indagación, reflexión y socialización con apoyo de tecnología”. Revista EMA 9, 38-64.

Grau, R. y Cuxart, A. (2002). “La calidad en el proceso de corrección de las pruebas de acceso a la Universidad: variabilidad y factores”. Revista de Investigación Educativa 20(1), 209-223.

López, Juan. (2012). La Taxonomía de Bloom y sus dos actualizaciones http://www.eduteka.org/TaxonomiaBloomCuadro.php3 (recuperado de Agosto 23, 2012).

Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. y Mazur, Eric. (2006). “Reducing the gender gap in the physic classroom. Am. Journal. Phys. 74(2), pp. 118-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2162549

Mazur, Erick. (2010). Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. New Jersey: Pentice Hall. Mazur, Eric. Comprensión o memorización: ¿Estamos enseñando lo correcto? (Conferencia dictada en la Universidad del Norte 9 de junio de 2011).

Mazur, Eric. and Crouch, C. (2001) “Peer Instruction: Ten years of experiences and results”. Am. Journal. Phys 69(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249

Mizuko Ito, et al. “Living and Learning with Media Summary of Findings Digital Youth Project”. http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11940. (recuperado Junio 21 de 2009).

Polya, G. & Shoenfeld, A. (1995). Cómo plantear y resolver problemas. México: Trillas.

Rico, Luis (1994). Errores en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas. En Educación Matemática. Errores y dificultades de los estudiantes. Resolución de problemas. Evaluación. Historia, editado por. Kilpatrick Jeremy, Gómez Pedro & Rico Luis, 69-108. Bogotá: Una Empresa Docente y Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica.

Rodriguez, E. (2002) El Assessment en el aula de clases. http:// bc.inter.edu/focus/a1_n2/elba.pdf - Puerto Rico (recuperado Febrero 11, 2011).

Scott, Pilzer. (2001). “Peer Instruction in Physics and Mathematics. Primus, Resources, and Issues”. Mathematics Undergraduate Studies. 11(2), 185 - 192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970108965987

Sommers, M. (1999) “Book of Review of Peer Instruction”. Am. Journal. Phys. 67(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00058-9

Published

2014-06-16

How to Cite

Escudero, R. E. (2014). Impact ot the “Peer Instruction Method” supported by “Clickers” on Basic Maths Learning. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review /Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia Y Sociedad, 3(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revtechno.v3.1180

Issue

Section

Research articles