Towards a use of “legal design thinking” techniques in tax law studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v12.4661Palabras clave:
Legal Design, Derecho Tributario, Legal Visualization, Legal Design Thinking, Contribuyente, Human-centered design, DigitalizaciónResumen
Para construir una relación entre la Administración Tributaria y los contribuyentes basada en la confianza se debe proporcionar la información necesaria relacionada con las políticas o instituciones, pero también informar a los contribuyentes sobre sus derechos y obligaciones. Esta información debe ser conocida pero, sobre todo, comprendida.
El objetivo es introducir un cambio de paradigma en la forma en que se abordan los estudios jurídicos a través de técnicas Legal Design. En concreto, para diseñar mecanismos que permitan la comunicación de información compleja que ayude tanto a la comprensión del derecho como a la toma de decisiones.
Citas
Antón Antón, A. (2020). Legal Design Thinking and Legal Visualization. Towards an Understandable Tax Law, Edunovatic 2020. Conference Proceedings: 5th Virtual International Conference on Education, Innovation and ICT, 682-687
Antón Antón, A. (2021). Principios del Human-centered Design en los estudios de Derecho Tributario: técnicas de Legal Design y Legal Visualization para facilitar el cumplimiento de las obligaciones tributarias, Edunovatic2021. Conference proceedings: 6th Virtual International Conferenceon Education, Innovation and ICT, 766-771
Bernal, D. W, and Hagan, M. D (2020). Redesigning Justice Innovation: A Standardized Methodology, Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties XVI, 2, 335-84.
Brown, T. & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design Thinking for Social Innovation, Stanford Social Innovation Review (8), 30-35.
Brunschwig, C. R. (2014). On visual law: visual legal communication practices and their scholarly exploration. In: Schweighofer, E. (et.al.) (eds), Zeichen und Zauber des Rechts: Festschrift für Friedrich Lachmayer. Editions Weblaw
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. MIT Design Issues, 20, 5-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design Research and the New Learning, MIT Design Issues, 17, 10-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2001.17.1.i
Cialdini, R. (2009). Employing the Power of Persuasion in Tax Compliance. Paper presented at the OECD/FTA Conference: Influencing Taxpayers’ Compliance Behaviour, 28-29 September, The Hague
Cyras, V. (et.al.) (2018). Introduction to legal visualization. In Schweighofer, E. (et. al.) (eds.) Data Protection/LegalTech: Proceedings of the 21st International Legal Informatics Symposium. Editions Weblaw,
Friis Dam, R. y Yu Siang, T. (2021). 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. Interactive Design Foundation. Interaction Design Foundation: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process (October, 2022)
Haapio, H. & Passera, S. (2013). Visual Law: What Lawyers Need to Learn from Information Designers. Retrieved from https://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2013/05/15/visual-law-what-lawyers-need-to-learn-from-information-designers/.
Hagan, M. (2017). A Visual Approach to Law. Miscellaneous Law School Publications. Retrieved from https://repository.law.umich.edu/miscellaneous/36
Hagan, M. (2018). Law By Design. Retrieved from http://www.lawbydesign.co/en/home/
Hagan, M. (2019). The Justice is in the Details: Evaluating Different Self-Help Designs for Legal Capability in Traffic Court. Journal of Open Access to the Law, 7(1), 1-16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3475124
Hagan, M. (2020). Legal Design as a Thing: A Theory of Change and a Set of Methods to Craft a Human-Centered Legal System, MIT Design Issues, 36, 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00600
Hagan, M. (2021) Introduction to Design Thinking for Law. In KATZ, DOLIN y BOMMARITO (Eds.) Legal Informatics, Cambridge (pp 155-175) Cambridge University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316529683.015
Jackson, Dan (2016). Human-Centered Legal Tech: Integrating Design in Legal Education, The Law Teacher, 50 (1), 82-97. DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2016.1146468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2016.1146468
Martha, D.F.( 2020) What is essential: Legal Design and client stories. The Elon Law Journal ,13, 39-46
Mitchell, J. A. (2020). Outlooks, Techniques, and Words: Product Design, Practicing Law, and Engaging Students in Legal Practice. SRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3521437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3521437
OECD (2017 ). Use of behavioural insights in consumer policy. OECD Science, Technology and Policy Papers, 36, OECD Publishing.
OECD (2018 ). Responsive School Systems: Connecting Facilities, Sectors and Programmes for Student Success. OECD Reviews of School Resources, OECD Publishing
Quintanilla, V.D. (2017) Human-Centered Civil Justice Design, Penn State Law Review, 121 (3), 745-806
Robinson, P. (2009). Graphic and Symbolic Representation of Law: Lessons From Cross-Disciplinary Research. E law: Murdoch University electronic journal of law 16(1), 53-83
Walsh, K. (2012). Understanding taxpayer behaviour–new opportunities for tax administration, The Economic and Social Review, 43(3), 451-475
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Aquellos autores/as que publiquen con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán los derechos morales sobre la obra y cederán a la revista los derechos comerciales.
- Transcurrido 1 año desde su publicación, la versión del editor pasará a estar en acceso abierto en la web de la editorial, pero la revista mantendrá el copyright de la obra.
- En el caso de que los autores deseen asignar una licencia abierta Creative Commons (CC), podrán solicitarla escribiendo a publishing@eagora.org.
