COVID as Shock Doctrine

Authors

  • Alejandro Caamaño López Universidad de Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4098

Keywords:

COVID-19, Shock doctrine, Policies, Social Welfare, Social Pychology, Pandemic, SARS-CoV-2

Abstract

The objective of this research is to investigate, from an interdisciplinary perspective between sociology, psychology, law and history, the management of the coronavirus crisis, which in the Spanish case is based on authoritarian lounge dure logics rooted in the XIX and absolutism. With the use of measures imposed by the authorities and assumed by a terrified citizenry, governments and the media have generated a turning point that has dismantled the associative fabric and the social movements that emerged in response to the bursting of the real estate bubble that occurred in Spain.

References

Amnistía Internacional. (2021). Gobiernos dejaron desprotegidas durante la pandemia a 2.700 millones de personas. Informe anual. Amnistía Internacional

Bonal, X. y González, S. (2020). The impact of lockdown on the learning gap: family and school divisions in times of crisis. International Review of Education, 66, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09860-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09860-z

Cozzo, E. y Prignano, L. (2016). No hay danza sin martillo. El Salto Diario.

Engzell, P., Frey, A. y Verhagen, M. D. (2020). Learning Inequality During the Covid-19 Pandemic. PNAS, 118(17). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118

Fontcuberta, L., Delclós, J., García, G., Martínez, J. M., Ramada, J. M., Seguí, M. D. M., & Ronda, E. (2021). 2020: Archivos en tiempos de la COVID-19. Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, 24(1), 12-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2021.24.01.02

Francés, P., Loayssa, J., Petruccelli, R. (2021). Covid-19. La respuesta autoritaria y la estrategia del miedo. Ediciones El Salmón.

Irigoyen, J. (2021). La burocracia experta salubrista y la vida en la pandemia. Tránsitos Intrusos.

Maldonado, J.E. y De Witte, K. (2020). The Effect of School Closures on standardised student test outcomes. Ku Leuven. Department of Economics.

Ministerio de Sanidad. (2021). Enfermedad por coronavirus covid-19. Información científico-técnica. Centro de Coordinación de Alertas y Emergencias Sanitarias.

Naciones Unidas, UN. (2020). UN Secretary-General’s policy brief: The impact of COVID-19 on women. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/04/policy-brief-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-women

Nelson, J. y Sharp, C (2020). Key findings from the Wave 1 survey. National Foundation for Educational Research.

Organización Mundial de la Salud, OMS. (2019). Non-Pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influence. Organización Mundial de la salud.

Organización Mundial de la Salud, OMS. (s.f.). United Nations Rule of Law support in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Recuperado en: https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/2020/05/united-nations-rule-of-law-support-in-the-context-ofcovid-19-pandemic/).

Parmet, W. E. (2018). Quarantining the law of quarantine: why quarantine law does not reflect contemporary constitutional law. Wake Forest JL & Pol’y, 9 (1).

Segato, R. L. (2020). Todos somos mortales: el coronavirus y la naturaleza abierta de la historia. Alerta global. Políticas, movimientos sociales y futuros en disputa en tiempos de pandemia. Clacso. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1gm027x.45

Seghezzo, G. y Dollorso, N. (2018). Del punitivismo al cuidado (feminista). El porvenir de la razón securitaria», Emergencias. Repensar el Estado, las subjetividades y la acción política. Ciccus.

Spinney, L. (2018). El jinete pálido. Crítica.

Tarabini, A. (2018). La escuela no es para ti. El rol de los centros educativos en el abandono escolar. Octaedro.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-19

How to Cite

Caamaño López, A. . (2022). COVID as Shock Doctrine. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 14(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.4098

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022): Monograph: "Quality of life in the 21st century. Communication on health improvement and awareness programs and environmental sustainability"

Section

Research Articles (Special Issue)

License

Those authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms:

  1. Authors will keep the moral right of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights.
  2. After 1 year from publication, the work shall thereafter be open access online on our website, but will retain copyright.
  3. In the event that the authors wish to assign an Creative Commons (CC) license, they may request it by writing to publishing@eagora.org