Does science dissemination have a gender?

Analysis of the articles published in The Conversation on Covid-19

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v12.4513

Keywords:

Dissemination, Science, Covid-19, Gender, Interaction, Women, Health

Abstract

This article analyzes the articles published on Covid-19 in the Spanish version of The Conversation from a gender perspective through a quantitative and qualitative analysis of 306 texts published over a year. The results indicate a greater presence of men in the first moments of the health emergency, while female scientists have only had a greater presence in social issues. Likewise, the texts signed by women have obtained less interaction from the audiences and a higher proportion of negative responses.

 

References

Andersen, J. P., Nielsen, M. W., Simone, N. L., Lewiss, R. E., & Jagsi, R. (2020). Meta-Research: COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected. Elife, 9. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58807

Alcíbar, M. (2015). Comunicación pública de la ciencia y la tecnología: una aproximación crítica a su historia conceptual. Arbor, 191(773), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.773n3012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.773n3012

Alonso-Arroyo, A.; Bolaños Pizarro, M.; González Alcaide, G.; Villamón, M., & Aleixandre Benavent, R. (2010). Análisis de género, productividad científica y colaboración de las profesoras universitarias de Ciencias de la Salud en la Comunidad Valenciana (2003-2007). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33 (4), 624-642. https://bit.ly/3CHUBqm DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.4.764

Amarasekara, I., & Grant, W. J. (2019). Exploring the YouTube science communication gender gap: A sentiment analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 68-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654

Andreu, J. (2001). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada [en línea]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2PL0kkW (consulta: 15 de julio de 2021).

Anzivino, M. (2021). Is public engagement gendered? An analytical proposal using some evidence from Italy. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211002060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211002060

Cambronero-Saiz, B., Segarra-Saavedra, J., & Cristófol-Rodríguez, C. (2021). Análisis desde la perspectiva de género del engagement de los principales youtubers de divulgación científica= Analysis of the engagement of the main popular science youtubers from a gender perspective. Cuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia, 16, 511-525. https://bit.ly/3kc9xa4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18002/cg.v0i16.6914

Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244-260. https://bit.ly/3GEdHyU DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645

Casero-Ripollés, Andreu (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. Profesional de la información, 29(2), e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23

Chinetti, S. (2021). Academic productivity and pandemic. Evidence from female economists during the COVID-19 crisis. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Xh8GTM (consulta: 14 de julio de 2021).

Clavijo, A. (2021). Trajectories of scientific production and family conciliation of women researchers in Quito. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 14, 45-60. https://bit.ly/3Xr902h DOI: https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.se1.2021.45-60

Conversation, The. 10 motivos que nos hacen diferentes. https://bit.ly/3vVXHDo

Côté, I. M., & Darling, E. S. (2018). Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? Facets, 3(1), 682-694. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2018-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2018-0002

Delgado López-Cózar E., & Martín-Martín A. (2020). La viralidad de la ciencia defectuosa: el contagioso impacto mediático de un preprint en bioRxiv sobre el coronavirus y sus efectos en la comunicación científica. Universidad de Granada. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3CJLlSV

Deryugina, T., Shurchkov, O., & Stearns, J. (2021, May). Covid-19 disruptions disproportionately affect female academics. In AEA Papers and Proceedings 111 (pp. 164-68). https://bit.ly/3IE7pSF DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211017

Diviu-Miñarro, C., & Cortiñas-Rovira, S. (2020). Cómo comunicar una pandemia a la sociedad: la visión de los profesionales. Estudio de caso de la Covid-19 en el sur de Europa. Profesional de la Informacion, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.12

Duch, J., Zeng, X. H. T., Sales-Pardo, M., Radicchi, F., Otis, S., Woodruff, T. K., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2012). The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PloS one, 7(12), e51332. https://bit.ly/3CLNk99 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051332

Eizmendi-Iraola, M., & Peña-Fernández, S. (2021). Fewer and Later: Women as Experts in TED Talks about COVID-19. Journalism and Media, 2(4), 808–818. https://bit.ly/3W4tHzR DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2040046

Eizmendi-Iraola, M., & Peña-Fernández, S. (2022). Gender Stereotypes Make Women Invisible: The Presence of Female Scientists in the Media. Social Sciences, 12(1), 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010030

https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010030

González-Sala, F., & Osca-Lluch, J. (2018). Desigualdad de género en órganos directivos y producción científica de las revistas iberoamericanas de psicología de mayor visibilidad internacional. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41 (3), e211. https://bit.ly/3QGNNzm DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.3.1506

Holden C. (2001). General contentment masks gender gap in first AAAS salary and job survey. Science, 294 (5541), 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5541.396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5541.396

Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS biology, 16(4), e2004956. https://bit.ly/2TpxNr5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956

Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. F. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual review of psychology, 51(1), 149-169. https://bit.ly/3CJXirz DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.149

Kalia, V., Patel, A. K., Moriarity, A. K., & Canon, C. L. (2017). Personal branding: a primer for radiology trainees and radiologists. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 14(7), 971-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.017

King, M. M., & Frederickson, M. E. (2021). The Pandemic Penalty: The gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity. Socius, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211006977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211006977

Krippendorff, K. (1990). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y Práctica. Paidos Comunicación.

Krukowski, R. A., Jagsi, R., & Cardel, M. I. (2021). Academic productivity differences by gender and child age in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine faculty during the COVID- 19 pandemic. Journal of Women's Health, 30(3), 341-347. https://bit.ly/3k0VKTy DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8710

Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature News, 504(7479), 211. https://bit.ly/3iERiJP DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a

Lazcano-Peña, D., Viedma, G. C., & Alcaino, T. V. (2019). Comunicación de la ciencia desde la mirada de los investigadores universitarios: entre el indicador y la vocación. Formación universitaria, 12(6), 27-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000600027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000600027

Lerchenmueller, M. J., Sorenson, O., & Jena, A. B. (2019). Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study. bmj, 367. https://bit.ly/3IDpssa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6573

Mestres, M. G., García, A. M., & Romero, M. D. I. (2012). La percepción social de los principales divulgadores españoles de la ciencia/Social perception of the main Spanish popular-science communicators. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 18(2), 757. https://bit.ly/3W6T0kM DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2012.v18.n2.41044

Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109

Mueller, C. M., Gaudilliere, D. K., Kin, C., Menorca, R., & Girod, S. (2016). Gender disparities in scholarly productivity of US academic surgeons. Journal of Surgical Research, 203(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.060

Myers, K. R., Tham, W. Y., Yin, Y., Cohodes, N., Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., ... & Wang, D. (2020). Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature human behaviour, 4(9), 880- 883. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y

Ortiz-Núñez, R. (2020). Análisis métrico de la producción científica sobre COVID-19 en SCOPUS.

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 31(3). https://bit.ly/3ka4iYy

Palomar Verea, C. (2009). Maternidad y mundo académico. Alteridades, 19(38), 55-73. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/747/74714814005.pdf

Pereira, M. D. M. (2021). Researching gender inequalities in academic labor during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Avoiding common problems and asking different questions. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S2), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12618

Peters, H. P., Dunwoody, S., Allgaier, J., Lo, Y. Y., & Brossard, D. (2014). Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the “new media” online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles? EMBO reports, 15(7), 749-753. https://bit.ly/3H18FxK DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201438979

Revuelta, G. (2018). Formación en comunicación en los estudios de grado. Análisis en las áreas de ciencias de la salud y la vida, ciencias ambientales y ciencias naturales. Mediaciones de la Comunicación, 13(2), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.2.2872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.2.2872

Segovia-Saiz, C., Briones-Vozmediano, E., Pastells-Peiró, R., González-María, E., & Gea-Sánchez, M. (2021). Techo de cristal y desigualdades de género en la carrera profesional de las mujeres académicas e investigadoras en ciencias biomédicas. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34, 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.10.008

Torres-Albero, C., Fernández-Esquinas, M., Rey-Rocha, J., & Martín-Sempere, M. J. (2011). Dissemination practices in the Spanish research system: scientists trapped in a golden cage. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510382361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510382361

Trench, B. (2009). Science reporting in the electronic embrace of the Internet. En Holliman, R., Whitelegg, L., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (Eds.). Investigating science communication in

the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media (pp 166-180). Oxford University Press.

Van der Lee, R., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12349-12353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510159112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510159112

Vasconcelos, E. F., Casali, M. E. A., de Araújo, K. A., & Pereira, K. L. (2021). O impacto da pandemia da COVID-19 no fenômeno do declínio organizacional: uma análise da produção científica. Brazilian Journal of Business, 3(1), 1075-1088. https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv3n1-061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv3n1-061

Vega, P. V. (Ed.). (2010). La feminización de las profesiones sanitarias. Fundacion BBVA.

Welbourne, D. J., & Grant, W. J. (2016). Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity. Public understanding of science, 25(6), 706-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068

Wimmer, R., & Dominick, J. (1996). La investigación científica de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona: Bosch Comunicación.

Wright, K. A., Haastrup, T., & Guerrina, R. (2021). Equalities in freefall? Ontological insecurity and the long-term impact of COVID‐19 in the academy. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12518

Published

2023-01-23

How to Cite

Eizmendi-Iraola, M., & Peña-Fernández, S. (2023). Does science dissemination have a gender? Analysis of the articles published in The Conversation on Covid-19. TECHNO REVIEW. International Technology, Science and Society Review /Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia Y Sociedad, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37467/revtechno.v12.4513

Issue

Section

Research articles