Heliox Project: Technological Environments for Functional Diversity


  • Mario Toboso CSIC
  • Roberto Feltrero UNED
  • Bruno Maltrás USAL




Functional Diversity, Interaction Environments, Technological Design, Design for All, Open Functionality


Design and construction of environments influences the functioning chances of people, in an enabling or disabling way. Traditional efforts to remove physical and architectural barriers have evolved into a more comprehensive and 'universalist' vision of accessibility requirements. In the case of new technologies, lack of accessibility produces inequalities and divides in two key aspects: access and use. Combining these two inequalities leads to inequality opportunities for individuals and social groups affected by the digital divide. In order to facilitate access and use to computer for people with nonstandard functioning, we present the technological solution 'Heliox', based on the principles of design for all, open functionality and representational multimodality of technological resources in ICT environment

Author Biographies

Mario Toboso, CSIC

Investigador del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas de España. Especialista en políticas para la discapacidad y la diversidad funcional.

Roberto Feltrero, UNED

Profesor colaborador de la UNED e investigador invitado en el Seminario sobre Sociedad del Conocimiento y Diversidad Cultural de la UNAM, México. Especialista en Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad y en el diseño de software para la diversidad. Director del Proyecto Heliox (www.proyectoheliox.org)

Bruno Maltrás, USAL

Profesor asociado de la USAL e investigador de Instituto de Estudios sobre la Ciencia y la Tecnología de la USAL. Especialista en Filosofía de la Tecnología y estudios sociales sobre la ciencia y la tecnología.


Aslaksen, F., Bergh, S., Bringa, O. & Heggem, E. (1997). Universal Design. Planning and Design for All. The Norwegian State Council on Disability. http://home.online.no/~bringa/universal.htm

BOE (2003). Ley 51/2003, de 2 de diciembre, de Igualdad de Oportunidades, No Discriminación y Accesibilidad Universal de las personas con discapacidad. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2003/12/03/pdfs/A43187-43195.pdf

CUD (Centre for Universal Design) (1997). Principlies of Universal Design. North Carolina State University. http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm

EIDD (European Institute for Design and Disability) (2004). Stockholm Declaration. http://www.designforalleurope.org/Design-for-All/EIDD-Documents/Stockholm-Declaration/

European Commission (2001). Discrimination by Design (Background Paper). Conference, Brussels, 3rd December. http://www.accessibletourism.org/resources/dfa_ia_en.pdf

G3ict (2007). The Accessibility Imperative. Implications of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for Information and Communication Technologies. http://g3ict.org/resource_center/g3ict_book_-_the_accessibility_imperative

Googin, G. & Ch. Newell. (2003). Digital Disability . United Kingdom: Rowan & Littlefield.

Moor, J. H. (1985). What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy, 16 (4), pp. 266-275

Mueller, J. L. (1998). Assistive technology and universal design in the workplace. Assistive Technology, 10(1), pp. 37-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131959

ONU (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm

Swain, J., French, S., Barnes, C. & Thomas, C. (2004). Disabling barriers–Enabling Enviroments. London: Sage.

Toboso, M. & Guzmán, F. (2010). Cuerpos, capacidades, exigencias funcionales... y otros lechos de Procusto. Política y Sociedad, 47 (1), pp. 67–83. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO1010130067A

UNESCO (1999). Declaración sobre la Ciencia y el Uso del Saber Científico , Budapest, 1 de julio. http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/esp/declaracion_s.htm

UNESCO (2001). COMEST Sub-Commission on “The Ethics of the Information Society”. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001248/124896e.pdf

Vacas, F. (2007). TVIC: Tecnologías para la vida cotidiana. Telos, 73. http://www.campusred.net/TELOS/editorial.asp?rev=73

Vanderheiden, G. C. (1998). Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: alternatives or complements? Assistive Technology, 10 (1), pp. 29-36.

Winner, L. (2007). Is there a right to shape technology? Argumentos de Razón Técnica, 10, pp. 305-328. [1] A.B. Pérez, C.D. García, y E.F. Martínez



How to Cite

Toboso, M., Feltrero, R., & Maltrás, B. (2015). Heliox Project: Technological Environments for Functional Diversity. HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional De Humanidades, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.37467/gka-revhuman.v4.747



Research articles