Submissions

This journal is not accepting submissions at this time.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • We only publish original and unpublished articles. The authors guarantee originality and the absence of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. They also guarantee that the manuscript does not violate the copyrights of third parties.
  • Text does not contain defamatory material, illicit, obscene, unlawful, invasive of privacy, hateful, xenophobic or ethically objectionable, threatening or contempt of Law.
  • The file will be sent in Microsoft Word, RTF or Open Office File format.
    Manuscripts in PDF format are not accepted.
  • The length of the article is between 5,000 and 12,000 words (abstracts, keywords and bibliography are excluded from this calculation). In case of reviews, the length is between 800 and 1,500 words.
  • The text meets APA bibliographic requirements and there are no references in the bibliography that are not cited in the text.
  • The document is free of data that identifies the author and co-authors to ensure an anonymous evaluation of the article.

Author Guidelines

Cost of publication: free.

General Requirements

  • Authors should ensure the accuracy of the quotes, charts, tables and maps.
  • Refrain from including irrelevant images and graphics in the article.
  • Keywords are very important for search engine positioning. To achieve a better dissemination of the work, please make sure your keywords are clear an precise.
  • If they want, authors can add at the end of the article, in an Acknowledgments heading, the financial support or subsidies received in the research.

Format Requirements

  • Graphics and images should be clear and easy to see. We cannot improve the quality of images.
  • All images, graphics and tables must be accompanied by a title and a source.
  • All images, graphics and tables should be placed where they will appear in the text.

Bibliographic References

The citation style chosen by this journal is the APA’s (American Psychological Association).The references in the text must follow an abbreviated format (Author, Year: pp.). The full reference list shall appear at the end of the article. Preferably include references from the last five years; It will increase the article possibilities of acceptance by the reviewers. Efforts should be made to minimize the number of footnotes.

Whenever possible, include the DOI for each article in the bibliographic list. Authors can use a citation generator of APA style to adapt their bibliography to APA 7th edition as the one in the following link: https://www.scribbr.com/citation/generator/

The list of references should appear at the end and look as follows:

  • Printed Book by One Author:

Reich, J. (2020). Failure to disrupt: Why technology alone can't transform education. Harvard University Press.

  • Electronic Book by One Author:

Miller, M. (2020). Tech like a pirate: using classroom technology to create an experience and make learning memorable. Dave Burgess Consulting, Incorporated.

  • Several Books by One Author:

Sugata, M. (2019a). The Hole In The Wall: Beginnings of a new education. Independently published.

Sugata, M. (2019b). The School in the Cloud: The Emerging Future of Learning. Corwin Teaching Essentials.

Sugata, M. (2021). Virus vs. the Internet: A practical handbook for schooling during and after the pandemic. Independently published.

  • Book by Two Authors:

Clark, H. & Avrith, T. (2020). The Google infused classroom: a guide to make thinking visible and amplify student voice. Elevate Books Edu.

  • Book by more than Two Authors:

lmes, W., Anastopoulou, S., Schaumburg, H., & Mavrikis, M. (2018). Technology-enhanced personalised learning: Untangling the evidence. Robert Bosch Stiftung GmbH. https://oro.open.ac.uk/56692/1/TEPL_en.pdf

  • Collective Book with Editors:

Koç S., Liu, X. & Wachira, P. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment in online and blended learning environments. IAP.

  • Book Chapter:

Sayeda, Z. (2021). Digital transformation trends in education. En D. Baker & L. Ellis (Eds). Future directions in digital information. Predictions, practice, participation (pp. 223-234). University of Illinois Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822144-0.00036-7

  • Journal Article:

Benton, L., Mavrikis, M., Vasalou, A., Joye, N., Sumner, E., Herbert, E., Revesz, A., Symvonis, A., & Raftopoulou, C. (2021). Designing for “challenge” in a large-scale adaptive literacy game for primary school children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1– 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13146

  • Video or Conference Presentation:

Tarazi, A. (2021, Junio 23). The rol of using  iPad technology on enhancing students' motivation towards learning English as a second language. [Video]. GKA EDU 2021 - 10th International Conference Education and Learning https://events.gkacademics.com/dashboard/videos/233

  • Film:

Leondis, T. (Director). (2017). Emoji the film [Film]. Sony Pictures Animation; Columbia Pictures.

  • Online Newspaper Article:

Svrluga, S. (2021, August 20). Using TikTok and Instagram, college students push the science behind covid vaccines. The Washingtong Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2021/08/20/college-covid-vaccines-tiktok-socialmedia/

  • Printed Newspaper Article:

McCall, A. (2021, septiembre 17). How universities failed students in the age of Covid. The Times. 

  • PhD Dissertation:

Bentinck, V.  (2020). La transición al aprendizaje combinado: las percepciones de los estudiantes sobre la interacción en línea. [Doctoral thesis, The Open University]. Open Research Online. doi: https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.00011b8d

  • Blog Post:

Rimes, B. (2029, January 3). What if assessments at school looked like this? The Tech Savvy Educator. http://www.techsavvyed.net/archives/4261

The author may decide the section REFERENCES distribution in several sections, with bibliographics references criteria different from the general ones: for example, including a webography or a primary sources list, without necessarily following the order of these instructions.

Editorial Quality

  • The peer review process is rigorous in order to ensure the quality of the content published in the journal. We expect the authors to revise their texts following the suggestions of the reviewers. If the authors do not perform such reviews and do not submit comments back, the manuscript will be definitely rejected.
  • Some manuscripts may be of excellent quality, but be poorly written in English. This may be the case for authors whose native language is not English. In this case, we could request the authors to re-write the article completely, independent of the final punctuation the article may have obtained. We have an editorial service that can be hired by the authors to improve the writing expression of the article.

Privacy Statement

In accordance with the provisions of Organic Law 15/1999, of December 13, on the Protection of Personal Data, we inform you that the data you provide will be included in a file owned by Educationlabconsulting , S.L., and whose purpose is to facilitate the provision of the services offered from the OJS and OCS platforms (in a database owned by Educationlabconsulting, S.L.) and to manage the relationship with users. Eagora Science Software, S.L., may use this data to send you information related to the products and services offered by Educationlabconsulting, S.L.

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

In any moment, you would be able to exercise your right to access, rectification, cancellation and disagreement addressing to Educationlab consulting, S.L. via e-mail to supadministracion@edulab.es, indicating the reference LOPD.