Riesgos y recomendaciones para la implementación de una biblioteca digital regional

Autores/as

  • Karim J. Gherab Martín

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37467/gkarevdig.v2.782

Resumen

El objetivo del presente artículo es analizar la creación de una biblioteca digital en una región española en función de los criterios que deben tenerse en cuenta a la hora de materializar un proyecto tan ambicioso y complejo, sugiriendo las medidas preventivas adecuadas con el fin de minimizar los riesgos y las amenazas asociados a un proyec-to de esta envergadura.

Citas

Cope, Bill and Mary Kalantzis, eds. (2009). Ubiquitous Learning . Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Copyright Board of Canada (2005). Copyright Act , http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/info/act-e.html#rid-33751.

Corbin, C. (2009): “EC Communication on the PSI re-use Directive: PSI re-use stakeholder reaction,” European PSI Platform (Topic Report No .3), available at http://www.epsiplus.net/topic_reports/topic_report_no_3_ec_communication_on_the_psi_re_use_directive_psi_re_use_stakeholder_reaction.

European Commission (2007). Report on Digital Preservation, Orphan Works and Out-of-Print Works , EU's High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemlongdetail.cfm?item_id=3366.

Eve, Martin Paul (2014). Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gherab-Martín, K. y J. L. González-Quirós, (2014). “Academic journals in a context of distributed

knowledge”, en B. Cope y A. Phillip (eds.), The Future of the Academic Journal

(pp. 113-137) (2ª edición). London: Chandos Publishing

González-Quirós, J. L. y K. Gherab-Martín (2009). “Arguments for an Open Model of e-Science,” en Bill Cope & Angus Phillip (eds.), The Future of the Academic Journal (pp. 63-83). London: Chandos Publishing.

González-Quirós, J. L. y K. Gherab-Martín (2006). El temple del saber: hacia la biblioteca digital universal . Barcelona: Deusto.

Harnad, S. (2003). “Electronic preprints and postprints”, en Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science . New York: Marcel Dekker, disponible en http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Temp/eprints.htm.

House of Commons – Science and Technology Committee (2004): Scientific Publications: Free for all? Tenth Report of Session 2003-04, Volume I: Report . London: The Stationery Office Limited, available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399.pdf.

Jacobs, N., ed. (2006). Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.

PIRA International (2000). Commercial exploitation of Europe’s public sector information: Final Report for the European Commission , Leatherhead: PIRA International, October 30, ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/econtent/docs/commercial_final_report.pdf.

PIRA International and University of East Anglia & KnowledgeView (2000). Commercial exploitation of Europe’s public sector information: Executive Summary . Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, September 20, ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/econtent/docs/2000_1558_en.pdf.

Shirky, Clay (2005). “Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags”, http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html#classification_and_its_discontents.

Suber, Peter (2012). Open Access . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. US Copyright Office (2006). Report on Orphan Works, enero 2006, http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report.pdf.

Weiss, P. N. (2006). “Borders in Cyberspace: Maximizing Social and Economic Benefit from Public Investment in Data,” in P. F. Uhlir and J. M. Esanu (rapporteurs), Strategies for Preservation of and Open Access to Scientific Data in China , pp. 40-42. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

— (2004). “Borders in Cyberspace: Conflicting Government Information Policies and Their Economic Impacts,” in J. M. Esanu and P. F. Uhlir (eds.), Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science , pp. 69-73. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

— (2002). Borders in Cyberspace: Conflicting Public Sector Information and their Economic Impacts —Summary Report . US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service. Available at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/sp/Borders_report.pdf.

Weiss, P. N. and P. Backlund (1997). “International Information Policy in Conflict: Open and Unrestricted Access versus Government Commercialization,” in B. Kahin and C. Nesson (eds.), Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure, pp. 300-321. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Willinsky, John (2006). The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Descargas

Publicado

2016-05-20

Cómo citar

Gherab Martín, K. J. (2016). Riesgos y recomendaciones para la implementación de una biblioteca digital regional. Revista Internacional Del Libro, Digitalización Y Bibliotecas, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.37467/gkarevdig.v2.782

Número

Sección

Artículos