USE OF APPARATUSES IN SCIENCE LABORATORY: Developmental Characteristics of Didactical Interactions
Teaching and learning through the use of tools is evolving in response to new developments in pedagogy that aim to enhance students’ high-order thinking skills. This paper presents results from part of a research project investigating innovative teaching pedagogy, engaging with active learning through students’ manipulation of apparatuses in a series of mathematics lessons conducted in a science laboratory. The findings of the study include illustration of the development of didactical interactions, a modified framework yielding multi-directional transitions of interactive activities. This serves not only to promote interactive learning activities, including various active forms of productions, but also embraces innovation in STEM education.
Bartolini Bussi, M.G. (1998). Verbal interaction in mathematics classroom: a Vygotskian analysis. IN H. Steinbing, M.G., Bartolini Bussi & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in mathematics classroom (pp. 65-84). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Lei, H., Chan, Y.C., & Leung, A. (2018). Implementation of tool-based mathematics lesson: a duo of material and digital tools. In L.Deng, W.K.W. Ma & C.W.R. Rong (Eds.), New Media for Education Change – Selected paper from HKAECT 2018 International Conference. Hong Kong: Springer.
Lei, H., & Leung, A. (2017). Tool-based mathematics lesson: a case study in transitions of activities in didactical cycle. In B. Kaur, W.K. Ho, T.L. Toh, & B.H. Choy (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, (pp. 145-152). Singapore: PME.
Loh, C.Y. (1984). The laboratory approach to teaching mathematics: some examples. Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 19-27.
Mariotti, M.A. (2009). Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective: the role of the teacher, ZDM Mathematics Education, 45:427-440.
Mariotti, M.A. (2012). ICT as opportunities for teaching-learning in a mathematics classroom: the semiotic potential of artefacts. Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, pp. 25-42. Taipei, Taiwan.
Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E.J. (2016). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ng, Y.F., Chan, K.K.J., Lei, H., Mok, P., & Leung, S.Y. (2019). Pedagogy and innovation in science education: a case study of experiential learning science undergraduate course. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sicnece, XXV, 2910-2926. https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.254
Roehrig, G.H., Moore, T.J., Wang, H.H., & Park, M.S. (2012). Is adding the E enough?: investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44.
Stake, R.E (2010). Qualitative research: studying how things work. New Work: Guilford Press.
Travers, M. (2001). Qualitative research through case studies. London: Sage.
Yin, R.K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Copyright (c) 2019 The International Education and Learning Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Those authors who have been published in this journal accept the following terms:
- Authors will keep the moral copyright of the work and they will transfer the commercial rights. In this way, the author will only be able to upload the author’s original version into his/her personal Website or into the university (or research center) institutional archive, but the publisher’s version won’t (copyright, commercial rights). You can see a explanation of the author’s original version and publisher’s version here.
- After two years in publication, publisher’s version shall thereafter become in open access online from our editorial website, but our review will retain the work’s copyright. In other words, publisher’s version will be accesible for everyone and permanently from our editorial Website, but it may not be upload in any other website. Anyone wanting to read or to download publisher’s version must visit our editorial website. In this way, if you want to reference publisher’s version in your personal website or into any institutional archive, you may link to our editorial website to reference publisher’s version.
- In case authors wanting to get publisher’s version in order to their works could freely circulate (for example,to upload publisher’s version in their personal’s website or into any institutional archive) they can do it on condition that they will have to pay an 85€ fee. In this case, our editorial will permanently assign to the publisher’s version. In such a way, an open license Creative Commons (CC) will be assigned by us. This license will allow for a free work circulation by the Internet, without anybody being able to appropriate it at no time. The authors may choose the type of license they wish, but it’s important to decide soundly which type of license they want. If you choose this option, we would be glad to offer free advisory service soyoy can safely choose the one that is best for you and for your particular case.